MALDEF Statement on Federal Court Ruling Striking Down the Addition of a Citizenship Question to the 2020 Census

LOS ANGELES – Thomas A. Saenz, president and general counsel of MALDEF (Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund), issued the following statement in response to today’s federal court ruling vacating the Trump administration’s decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 Census and concluding that the addition of the question violates the Administrative Procedures Act (APA).

MALDEF AND ADVANCING JUSTICE SUE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION, CHALLENGING ADDITION OF CITIZENSHIP QUESTION TO 2020 CENSUS

LOS ANGELES – The Trump administration’s eleventh-hour decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 Census violates the U.S. Constitution because it is racially discriminatory and could result in a severe undercount of minorities, according to a federal lawsuit filed today by nearly two dozen groups and individuals.

Census Citizenship Question is Unconstitutional

A federal lawsuit, La Unión del Pueblo Entero v. Ross, challenges the Trump administration for ordering that a citizenship question be added to the 2020 Census. The goal is to severely undercount Latinos, Asian Americans, immigrants, and other populations to dilute their political representation.